travel

Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property

Font size+Author:World Wanderer news portalSource:opinions2024-05-22 11:16:22I want to comment(0)

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a q

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.

By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.

Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.

Related articles
  • I hoarded so many items people called me 'Skip Man' and I was scared to walk around my house

    I hoarded so many items people called me 'Skip Man' and I was scared to walk around my house

    2024-05-22 10:12

  • Xi Sends Congratulatory Letter to Liangzhu Forum

    Xi Sends Congratulatory Letter to Liangzhu Forum

    2024-05-22 09:44

  • Exhibiting a timeless elegance

    Exhibiting a timeless elegance

    2024-05-22 09:07

  • Exhibiting a timeless elegance

    Exhibiting a timeless elegance

    2024-05-22 09:04

Netizen comments